[Harp-L] re: Digitechs of the lower order
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] re: Digitechs of the lower order
- From: martin oldsberg <martinoldsberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 08:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1283528335; bh=OJkaR1vwW6lqHtJC8CAeLrbNSTv3E++EeBzcukbBjuQ=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=t2DVr+LnpnkezeuxuE+Fi5Tri/NmuCbKmJ5VQIn2u/s/XRHFmdddj6NgQO/L9Z1bhsM9cM9eYWIYVXO3LJ1U+Q5LBzk6iQ7OY0/4xMW0eAyUqIC8OiLo0bUUKlYzMOMMrhkLTtkAuXtt+91dWTpkc3wbK45GpDGRkEh60f6EDZ0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MS8YiK7ibyfCYl78ONeRgsHCwhs6DiMepSztroV9IYu50Dwyk02pjR8D+L7xLCXtSMLk8Qa/rFiGwvq0oAhmIiJsC8F9u8f7vnmBG1czBsVZ8/1SRWn8yiYA4TLyYVSGl05i0J/fzCIRRE6MAFiT8JLIm+SPOI+XwrPU7vRKSmo=;
Thanks to all for input on the lower order Digitechs. (I slide off the list with an annoying regularity so I have to read from the archives; hence no individual thank yous.)
A conclusion to be drawn appears to be that this gadget is NOT a user friendly thing, if you have to tamper with it, i.e. going beyond factory settings. This, of course, is the basis for Richard H:s separately sold manual, and maybe necessary to make it interesting for the harp.
This holds me back quite a bit, since I´m one of those unfortunate not so few who´s passion for fiddling with technical stuff is seriously tempered, mildly put. (I just changed reed-plates on an LO and that´s quantum satis for a good while as far as I´m concerned; I´ve now got a headache you could feel from outer space. If I ever buy an RP355 I´ll have an order in Richard´s mailbox before my ass is back on this chair.)
But the size and the prize is appealing ...
Cheers,
Martin
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.